Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/403
of 18 March 2016
supplementing Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the classification of serious infringements of the Union rules, which may lead to the loss of good repute by the road transport operator, and amending Annex III to Directive 2006/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
(Text with EEA relevance)
Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/403
of 18 March 2016
supplementing Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the classification of serious infringements of the Union rules, which may lead to the loss of good repute by the road transport operator, and amending Annex III to Directive 2006/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing common rules concerning the conditions to be complied with to pursue the occupation of road transport operator and repealing Council Directive 96/26/EC, and in particular Article 6(2) thereof,
Having regard to Directive 2006/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on minimum conditions for the implementation of Council Regulations (EEC) No 3820/85 and (EEC) No 3821/85 concerning social legislation relating to road transport activities and repealing Council Directive 88/599/EEC, and in particular Article 9(3) thereof,
Whereas:
- The Commission is required by Article 6(2)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 to draw up a list of categories, types and degrees of seriousness of serious infringements of Union rules, which in addition to those set out in Annex IV to that Regulation, may lead to the loss of good repute of the road transport undertaking or the transport manager.
- To this end, the Commission should define the degree of seriousness of infringements by reference to the risk of fatalities or serious injuries and should provide the frequency of occurrence beyond which repeated infringements shall be regarded as more serious.
- The list of categories, types and degrees of seriousness of serious infringements to be established should contain infringements of the Union rules relating to the areas outlined in Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009.
- Member States should take into account information on those infringements when setting priorities for the checks targeting undertakings which are classified as posing increased risk, as required by Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009.
- The measures to be adopted are necessary to ensure transparency, fairness and legal certainty in appraising the seriousness of infringements and their implications for good repute of the transport undertaking or the transport manager.
- However, it is the responsibility of the Member State's competent authority to carry out a complete national administrative procedure to determine whether a loss of good repute would constitute a proportionate response in an individual case. Such a national examination procedure should include, where appropriate, checks at the premises of the undertaking concerned. In assessing the good repute Member States should consider the conduct of the undertaking, of its managers and of any other relevant person.
- The harmonised categorisation of serious infringements should provide the basis for extending the national risk rating system established by each Member State pursuant to Article 9 of Directive 2006/22/EC, in order to cover all serious infringements of the Union road transport rules, indicated in Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009, which may affect the good repute of the transport undertaking or the transport manager.
- Article 16(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 also provides that Member States should include those serious infringements in the national electronic register of road transport undertakings on 1 January 2016 at the latest. The harmonised categorisation of infringements is thus an important step forward ensuring fair competition between undertakings, more harmonised enforcement and an effective functioning of the European Register of Road Transport Undertaking system of exchange of information.
- In the interest of transparency and fair competition a common method should be established for the calculation of a frequency of occurrence beyond which repeated infringements shall be regarded as more serious by the competent authority of the Member State of establishment. Such repeated infringements may lead to launching the national administrative procedure, which, subject to the discretion of the competent authority, may result in the loss of good repute by a transport operator.
- As a general rule, the frequency should be determined by taking into account the seriousness of the infringement, the time and the average number of drivers. It shall be seen as the maximum threshold, whilst leaving Member States a possibility to apply lower thresholds, as envisaged in their national administrative procedure for assessing good repute.
- To ensure the legal consistency and transparency it is also necessary to amend Annex III to Directive 2006/22/EC by changing the level of seriousness of certain infringements set out therein in accordance with the list of most serious infringements set out in Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009.
- The list of categories, types and degrees of seriousness of serious infringements has been determined in consultation with Member States and the Union stakeholders, where the assessment of the level of seriousness has been based on best practice and experience in the enforcement of the relevant legislative provisions in Member States. The most serious infringements established in Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 constituted the reference upper threshold for the assessment of the level of seriousness of other relevant infringements.
- The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on Road Transport set up by Article 18(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85,
Article 1
1. This Regulation establishes a common list of categories, types and degrees of serious infringements of the rules in commercial road transport, as laid down in Annex I to this Regulation, which, in addition to those set out in Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009, may lead to the loss of good repute of a road transport operator.
2. This Regulation provides for the maximum frequency of occurrence beyond which repeated serious infringements shall be regarded as more serious, by taking into account the number of drivers used for the transport activities managed by the transport manager, as laid down in Annex II.
3. The Transport Commission shall take into account information on the serious infringements referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 when carrying out the national administrative procedure on assessing good repute.
Article 2
Deleted
Article 3
Deleted
Done at Brussels, 18 March 2016.
ANNEX I
Categorisation of serious infringements
(referred to in Article 1)
The following tables contain categories and types of serious infringements against the Union rules in commercial road transport, divided into three categories of seriousness according to their potential to create a risk of fatalities or serious injuries.
1. Groups of infringements against Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Driving and resting time)
a MSI = most serious infringements/VSI = very serious infringement/SI = serious infringement.
|
||||||
No | LEGAL BASIS | TYPE OF INFRINGEMENT | LEVEL OF SERIOUSNESSa | |||
MSI | VSI | SI | ||||
Crew | ||||||
1. | Article 5.1 | Not respecting minimum ages for conductors | X | |||
Driving periods | ||||||
2. | Article 6.1 | Exceed daily driving time of 9h if possibilities to extend to 10h not allowed | 10h ≤ … < 11h | X | ||
3. | 11h ≤ … | X | ||||
4. | Exceed daily driving time of 9h by 50 % or more without taking a break or without any rest of at least 4,5 hours |
13h30 ≤ … and no break/rest |
X | |||
5. | Exceed extended daily driving time of 10h if extension allowed | 11h ≤ … < 12h | X | |||
6. | 12h ≤ … | X | ||||
7. | Exceed daily driving time of 10h by 50 % or more without taking a break of or without any rest of at least 4,5 hours |
15h ≤ … and no break/rest |
X | |||
8. | Article 6.2 | Exceed weekly driving time | 60h ≤ … < 65h | X | ||
9. | 65h ≤ … < 70 | X | ||||
10. | Exceed weekly driving time by 25 % or more | 70h ≤ … | X | |||
11. | Article 6.3 | Exceed maximum total driving time during 2 consecutive weeks | 100h ≤ … < 105h | X | ||
12. | 105h ≤ … < 112h30 | X | ||||
13. | Exceed maximum total driving time during 2 consecutive weeks by 25 % or more | 112h30≤ … | X | |||
Breaks | ||||||
14. | Article 7 | Exceed uninterrupted driving time of 4,5 hours before taking the break | 5h ≤ … < 6h | X | ||
15. | 6h ≤ … | X | ||||
Rest Periods | ||||||
16. | Article 8.2 | Insufficient daily rest period of less than 11h if reduced daily rest period not allowed | 8h30 ≤ … < 10h | X | ||
17. | … < 8h30 | X | ||||
18. | Insufficient reduced daily rest period of less than 9h if reduce allowed | 7h ≤ … < 8h | X | |||
19. | … < 7h | X | ||||
20. | Insufficient split daily rest period of less than 3h + 9h | 3h + [7h ≤ … < 8h] | X | |||
21. | 3h + [… < 7h] | X | ||||
22. | Article 8.5 | Insufficient daily rest period of less than 9h for multi-manning | 7h ≤ … < 8h | X | ||
23. | … < 7h | X | ||||
24. | Article 8.6 | Insufficient reduced weekly resting period of less than 24 h | 20h ≤ … < 22h | X | ||
25. | … < 20h | X | ||||
26. | Insufficient weekly resting period of less than 45 h if reduced weekly resting period not allowed | 36h ≤ … < 42h | X | |||
27. | … < 36h | X | ||||
28 | Article 8.6 | Exceeding 6 consecutive 24-hour periods following the previous weekly rest period | 3h ≤ … < 12h | X | ||
12h ≤ … | X | |||||
12-day rule derogation | ||||||
29. | Article 8.6a. | Exceeding 12 consecutive 24-hour periods following a previous regular weekly rest | 3h ≤ … < 12h | X | ||
12h ≤ … | X | |||||
30. | Article 8.6a. (b)(ii) | Weekly rest period taken following 12 consecutive 24-hour periods | 65h < … ≤ 67h | X | ||
… ≤ 65h | X | |||||
31. | Article 8.6a. (d) | Driving period, between 22.00 and 6.00, of more than 3 hours before the break, if the vehicle is not multi-manned | 3h < … < 4,5 h | X | ||
4,5 h ≤ … | X | |||||
Work organisation | ||||||
32. | Article 10.1 | Link between wage and distance travelled or amount of goods carried | X | |||
33. | Article 10.2 | No or improper organisation of driver's work, no or improper instructions given to driver enabling him to comply with the law | X |
2. Groups of infringements against Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Tachograph)
3. Groups of infringements against Directive 2002/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (Working time rules - Road Transport (Working Time) Regulations 2005 and Part IVA of the Transport Act 1998)
4. Groups of infringements against Council Directive 96/53/EC (Weight and dimension rules - Vehicles (Construction, Equipment and Maintenance) Regulations)
5. Groups of infringements against Directive 2014/45/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (Periodic roadworthiness tests - Motor Vehicle Test Regulations 1987) and Directive 2014/47/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (Technical roadside inspection - Transport (Roadside Test) Regulations 2003)
Transport (Roadside Test) Regulations 2003 contains in Schedule 2 a detailed classification of technical deficiencies divided, according to their level of severity, into minor, major and dangerous deficiencies. Defined as follows :
- minor deficiencies having no significant effect on the safety of the vehicle or impact on the environment, and other minor non-compliances;
- major deficiencies that may prejudice the safety of the vehicle or have an impact on the environment or put other road users at risk, or other more significant non-compliances;
- dangerous deficiencies constituting a direct and immediate risk to road safety or having an impact on the environment.
The level of infringements against the provisions of the roadworthiness directives shall reflect the classification of deficiencies contained in Schedule 2 of the Transport (Roadside Test) Regulations 2003, namely: SI = major deficiencies; VSI = dangerous deficiencies; MSI = driving with deficiencies, which creates immediate risk to road safety. Minor deficiencies would be equal to the level of minor infringements.
6. Groups of infringements against Council Directive 92/6/EEC (Speed limitation devices - Vehicles (construction, Equipment and Maintenance) Regulations)
No | LEGAL BASIS | TYPE OF INFRINGEMENTS | LEVEL OF SERIOUSNESS | ||
MSI | VSI | SI | |||
1. | Article 2 and 3 | Speed limitation device not fitted | X | ||
2. | Article 5 | Speed limitation device not satisfying the applicable technical requirements | X | ||
3. | Article 5 | Speed limitation device not fitted by an approved workshop | X | ||
4. | Using a fraudulent device able to falsify data of speed limitation device or using a fraudulent speed limitation device | X |
7. Groups of infringements against Directive 2003/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (Initial qualification and periodic training of drivers - Traffic (Drivers’ Qualification and Training) Regulations 2008)
No | LEGAL BASIS | TYPE OF INFRINGEMENTS | LEVEL OF SERIOUSNESS | ||
MSI | VSI | SI | |||
Training and licence | |||||
1. | Article 3 | Carrying goods or passengers without a compulsory initial qualification and/or compulsory periodic training | X | ||
2. | Article 10 and Annex II | Driver unable to present the valid qualification card or the driving licence with the marking, as required by the national law (e.g.: lost, forgotten, damaged, unreadable) | X |
8. Groups of infringements against Directive 2006/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (Driving licences requirements - Traffic (Licensing and Registration) Regulations)
No | LEGAL BASIS | TYPE OF INFRINGEMENTS | LEVEL OF SERIOUSNESS | ||
MSI | VSI | SI | |||
1. | Articles 1 and 4 of Directive 2006/126/EC | Carrying passengers or goods without holding a valid driving licence | X | ||
2. |
Article 1 Annex I |
Using a driving licence which is damaged or unreadable or not in line with common model | X |
9. Groups of infringements against Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (Transport of dangerous goods by road - Transport (Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road) Regulations 2010 and the Transportable Pressure Equipment Regulations 2011)
Commission Directive 2004/112/EC, adapting Council Directive 95/50/EC on uniform procedures for checks on the transport of dangerous goods by road, contains in its Annex II a detailed classification of infringements against the relevant provisions, divided, according to their level of severity, into three risk categories: risk category I, risk category II, risk category III.
The level of infringements against the provisions shall reflect the risk categories provided in Annex II to Directive 2004/112/EC, in such a way that risk category I = VSI (except those infringements which are already defined as MSI in Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009); risk category II = SI. Risk category III is equal to the level of minor infringement.
This table covers only those infringements for which a carrier shall be held fully or partially liable. The level of liability of a carrier for the infringement shall be assessed in accordance with national enforcement procedure.
10. Groups of infringements against Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Access to the international road haulage market)
11. Groups of infringements against Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Access to the market for coach and bus services)
12. Groups of infringements against Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 (Animal transport)
ANNEX II
Frequency of occurrence of serious infringements
1. The serious (SI) and very serious (VSI) infringements listed in Annex I, when committed repeatedly shall be regarded as more serious by the competent authority. When calculating the frequency of occurrence of repeated infringements the competent authority shall take into account the following factors:
2. Taking into account the potential of creating a risk to road safety the maximum frequency of serious infringements beyond which they should be considered as more serious shall be established as follows:
3. The number of infringements per driver per year is an average figure calculated by dividing the total number of all infringements of the same level of seriousness (SI or VSI) by the average number of drivers employed during the year. The frequency formula provides for a maximum threshold for occurrence of serious infringements beyond which they shall be considered more serious. The Transport Commission may establish stricter thresholds if envisaged in its national administrative procedure for assessing good repute.
ANNEX III
Deleted